RMS actively opposes the term "open source" because it's less free than his "free software" definition, the success of which he considers OSI to leech on. OSI and FSF approved licenses contain no such ambiguity.Īlso, there's the down-watering of the term itself. That's why FOSS enthusiast tend to be a little purist about it. your professional marketing material? You could very well be in breach of the NC clause. But what if you're a contractor and your Github is part of your public profile, i.e. I totally get that the author doesn't want somebody to come along and go make money on the back of his work.īut let's say that you download the code, enhance it and put it on your Github for the world to see. It is, when you think about it, a very strong restriction on what you can do with it. ![]() The problem is the "NC" = non-commercial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |